National Science Foundation to close its overseas offices

first_img Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe On guard against avian influenza, a worker disinfects a poultry market in China. The U.S. National Science Foundation’s Beijing office helped organize a workshop for this April that will examine the ecology of infectious diseases such as bird flu. Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Email National Science Foundation to close its overseas offices EyePress/Newscom center_img By Dennis Normile, Richard StoneFeb. 26, 2018 , 2:20 PM A plan by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) to close its overseas offices, first reported on the Science | Business website, is getting mixed reviews in the scientific community. Last week, NSF announced it would shutter its outposts in Beijing, Brussels, and Tokyo by summer; two U.S. staff will return to the agency’s headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, and local staff will be reassigned to U.S. embassies. The change reflects a desire for NSF to be “more strategic and focused” in its international affairs, says Rebecca Keiser, head of NSF’s international office.“This is definitely the wrong move,” asserts Hitoshi Murayama, a theoretical physicist at University of California (UC), Berkeley, and the Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe at the University of Tokyo, who has worked with NSF’s Tokyo office on events for graduate students and U.S. scientists in Japan. NSF underestimates “the importance of personal connections [in promoting] critical international collaborations in science,” he says. “The U.S. is becoming more inward looking.”NSF set up the Tokyo office in 1960. It established a European office in Paris in 1984 and relocated it to Brussels in 2015. The Beijing office opened in 2006. The office websites claim they were instrumental in fostering international cooperation in ocean drilling, earthquake engineering, studies of gravitational waves, and academic exchange programs. Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country “It’s really a shock,” says William Chang, who opened NSF’s Beijing office and is now special adviser for the Asia-Pacific region for the University of Hawaii system. NSF’s China representative, he says, “is constantly in touch” with counterparts at the country’s main science agencies, collecting information on China’s scientific strengths and helping facilitate visits of NSF-funded researchers—all at a cost of about $650,000 a year. The office has also helped resolve crises: For instance, during his tenure as NSF’s China representative, Chang in 2007 intervened when a team of geoscientists from Arizona State University and UC Davis was accused of illegal surveying while conducting fieldwork in western China. Chang later helped negotiate the return of their equipment and field data. A recent feather in the cap of NSF’s Beijing office is its efforts to broker connections between U.S. and Chinese scientists who study the ecology of infectious disease; it is organizing a workshop on the topic in China in April.Chang says he’s perplexed that NSF would voluntarily sacrifice its on-the-ground capacity abroad. “Why would you want to do that to yourself?” he asks. “This is really short-sighted.”NSF’s Keiser disagrees, and calls the decision “strategic.” Nor was it made in haste, she says: The fate of the offices “has been under study for quite a while.” A few years ago, an internal NSF review recommended that the agency consider expanding its overseas presence by opening an office in Brazil and either launching an Asia-wide office in Singapore or broadening the remit of the Tokyo office to serve as a regional hub. The decision to shutter the offices altogether reflects NSF’s desire to be more nimble in responding to opportunities “where great science is percolating,” Keiser says. That means dispatching small teams on trips of up to a week in duration to size up the state of a specific discipline and explore collaborations.As a pilot project of the new approach, an NSF-led team visited Australia last October to discuss new research avenues in gravitational wave physics. “They brought a wonderful report back” on potential projects that would build on the stunning findings of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, Keiser says. Other possible topics for exploratory visits, she says, are synthetic biology in Germany and the Netherlands, and burgeoning investments in information technology in the Balkans.last_img read more